WISBECH: Fenland Council to pay costs after man wins planning battle to convert derelict building
EXCLUSIVE By JOHN ELWORTHY A BITTER dispute over converting an historic Wisbech building into flats has landed Council Tax payers with a hefty bill for costs after councillors were sharply criticised for ignoring officers advice. Planning inspector Wend
By JOHN ELWORTHY
A BITTER dispute over converting an historic Wisbech building into flats has landed Council Tax payers with a hefty bill for costs after councillors were sharply criticised for ignoring officers' advice.
Planning inspector Wenda Fabian said Fenland District Council had "little basis for the reasons for refusal" and the applicants had therefore incurred the full costs of preparing for two appeals.
You may also want to watch:
"I find that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary expenses has been demonstrated and that a full award of costs is justified," she said.
Ms Fabian has allowed Felix Apicella to go ahead with converting 7 Nene Quay into flats which she says would neither harm the character or appearance of the building or affect the adjacent Rose and Crown Hotel.
- 1 Election shock: Tories lose overall control of Cambridgeshire County Council
- 2 Tories retain two Wisbech seats for county council
- 3 Man on the run after stealing e-scooter from child
- 4 Two charged with Wisbech murder
- 5 Suspected drug dealers arrested in Wisbech raid
- 6 Election 2021: Wisbech West tops poll for lowest turnout
- 7 First wholetime woman firefighter in Cambs retires after 30 years
- 8 Three derelict cottages sell in auction for £122,000
- 9 Tories retain Octavia Hill ward in by election
- 10 New £1.5million Co-op store opens its doors – creating 12 local jobs
She said the council had provided "only very limited evidence" in respect of the reasons for refusal and rounded on the council for not agreeing to the plans which Mr Apicella and his agent had spent a great deal of time and effort in discussing with officers.
Ms Fabian said:
n No objection was raised to the appearance of the building or its visual effect on surrounding listed buildings
n The definition of the harm that would arise from over development "was vague"
n No evidence was put forward about alleged traffic dangers
She said it was clear that the application "could reasonably have been permitted" and the need for the hearing could, therefore, reasonably have been avoided.
The appeal building was formerly the 18th century coach house and stables for the Rose and Crown but following a fire it was de-listed in 1998. Although it remains an important part of the setting of the hotel, it is now under different ownership.
Ms Fabian said part of 7 Nene Quay already had consent for housing and she rejected the claim it was needed for commercial purposes.