Returning officer issues code of conduct reminder to Wisbech by election campaigners following ‘comments’ after May poll
- Credit: Archant
Returning officer Paul Medd has reminded all those involved in this week’s by election to Wisbech Town Council of a “code of conduct” for campaigners.
In a tersely worded letter to political agents, Mr Medd said that following a review of the May 2017 elections both he and the elections team had been “made aware of a number of comments in relation to these polls.
“Whilst we have absolute confidence regarding the processes that we follow to ensure electoral integrity, I thought it timely to take this opportunity to highlight the code of conduct for campaigners”.
His advice has been issued as Waterlees goes to the polls following the sudden resignations of Alan Lay, Virginia Bucknor and Michael Bucknor from the town council.
Mr Medd says the code provides a guide for campaigners, electoral administrators and the police as to “what is, and is not, considered acceptable behaviour at polling stations and in the community during the lead-up to polling day”.
You may also want to watch:
He says those involved must adopt the principle of asking “what would a reasonable observer think?”-
Of four specifics mentioned in his letter the first two cover proxy votes and the second two cover what action to take if an offence is suspected.
- 1 Minor injury unit closes to allow staff to respond to crisis in the community
- 2 Body of missing Wisbech man found in Norfolk
- 3 New owners of town centre store under fire for flats plan
- 4 60 care home residents and staff vaccinated
- 5 Man guilty of murdering partner's baby son
- 6 Coronavirus test centre staff ‘receive abuse’ from angry motorists
- 7 Man, 39, convicted of assault on two HMRC officers by beating
- 8 Man, 21, with 15,000 indecent images and videos plus 'paedophile manual' spared jail
- 9 Vaccine roll-out begins, 12 hours a day, seven days a week
- 10 'Small number of Covid-19 deaths' at care home
The returning officer says campaigners need to remind voters about their use of proxy votes and to realise that they not entitled to vote on polling day if they have already applied done so.
“Electors should be encouraged to explore other options for people to act as a proxy – including relatives or neighbours for example- before a campaigner agrees to be appointed as a proxy,” says Mr Medd.
“To minimise the risk of suspicions that campaigners may be seeking to place undue pressure on electors, electors should not be encouraged to appoint a campaigner as their proxy”.
He also says campaigners should be encouraged to give the police a statement and to substantiate any allegations of electoral fraud.
He warned that unsubstantiated claims about electoral fraud have the potential to damage confidence in the integrity of the electoral process.
“You should ensure you are confident that evidence can be provided to the police before considering whether it is appropriate to publicise any specific allegation,” says Mr Medd.
He also points out that tellers (those who check their supporters at the polling stations) must be aware of the constraints of their role and the need to comply with any requests made by presiding officers regarding their conduct with electors.