Planners home in
HE can huff and he can puff all he likes, but planners are determined to blow up to £40,000 on demolishing Charlie Cunningham s barn-cum-house. West Norfolk Borough Council is expected to await a final court hearing in March before going ahead with removi
HE can huff and he can puff all he likes, but planners are determined to blow up to £40,000 on demolishing Charlie Cunningham's barn-cum-house.
West Norfolk Borough Council is expected to await a final court hearing in March before going ahead with removing the building at Wheatley Bank, Walsoken.
However, local councillors have told residents that the council is considering tenders to have the barn removed.
Councillor Roy Groom said: "There has been progress and the council has put out the tenders to get the work carried out.
You may also want to watch:
"I think there could be a legal situation since the cost is not a burden the council would want to fall upon themselves."
A council official said a summons was being issued for a court date in March when Mr Cunningham would be challenged over not complying with an enforcement order to remove the building.
- 1 Businessman slams council’s coronavirus grants in explosive live rant
- 2 Woman, 78, suffers horrific injuries after e-scooter hit-and-run
- 3 £100k homes scrapped 'with almost immediate effect' says Mayor
- 4 Murder suspect is victim's son
- 5 Fleeing heroin dealer rams police car but they get him in the end
- 6 Two men with links to Cottenham on 'most wanted' list
- 7 Fly-tipped sofa second reported incident this week
- 8 Hairdressing student is best of 1,000 after winning national competition
- 9 'Police repeatedly failed me' over noisy neighbour saga, claims resident
- 10 Pervert filmed himself having sex with girl, 14, and then shared video online
She said the council had not yet received or accepted a tender for demolition but added that the council "is entitled to take reasonable steps in recovering their costs".
Councillor Carol Sharp, cabinet member for development, said: "Unauthorised development is a matter which this council views very seriously."
She said the council remained concerned that the building under construction was effectively a house, despite claims from Mr Cunningham that it was a barn.
"The building was constructed with many windows, domestic-sized doors, two storeys and internal walls," said Cllr Sharp.
However the council's concerns expressed before Christmas over the "ornate iron railings and gates" have prompted action from Mr Cunningham. He has since had them removed.