Gorefield holiday log cabin plan set to be foiled because of flooding fears
- Credit: Archant
A businessman has been told he can’t build a holiday log cabin next to a lake because of a flood risk.
Daniel Humphrey hoped to build a two-storey two-bedroom chalet holiday let on grassed land behind the site of demolition service business David Humphrey and Son at Cattledyke in Gorefield.
The applicant said: “We propose only one holiday let accommodation as it is less intrusive on the natural wildlife without the disturbance of many holiday makers.
“The existing lakes are large enough to accommodate many log cabins surrounding the lakes but it is proposed only one, due to the disturbance to nature this type of proposal could create.
“The log cabin will be used in conjunction with the existing lakes, providing accommodation for tourists and nature enthusiasts who wish to stay at the lakes and have an open view of the natural area.”
You may also want to watch:
The proposal received one letter of support, which said the development was “a good thing for the local community”, but the site lies within flood zones 2 (medium risk) and 3 (high risk).
Fenland District Council officers, recommending refusal, said: “It is not considered that a single private holiday unit, located in an unsustainable location, would constitute a wider community benefit which would outweigh flood risk implications.
- 1 Pets saved in horrific rescue start to be rehomed
- 2 Wisbech nightspot up for sale for £410,000
- 3 A47 to close overnight near Wisbech for roadworks
- 4 Cant's Drove loses 'worst road in the Fens' title
- 5 Threatening domestic abuser tracked and assaulted ex partner of 10 years
- 6 'Savage' attack left man without spleen
- 7 7 of the most expensive houses on the market in Cambridgeshire right now
- 8 Man with rare heart condition shares how free location app saved his life
- 9 CCTV released after shopkeeper assaulted in robbery
- 10 'Father' found guilty of murdering his teenage daughter
“Whilst the design detailing of the development may be acceptable there are fundamental conflicts with policy concerning the principle of the proposal and flood risk which cannot be overcome.”