Council accused of 'abuse of process'
A PLANNING inspector described as an abuse of process the late arrival of evidence supporting Fenland Council s opposition to a pair of semi detached homes in Wisbech. Colin Tyrell said the council s actions were most unusual but decided it would be
A PLANNING inspector described as "an abuse of process" the late arrival of evidence supporting Fenland Council's opposition to a pair of semi detached homes in Wisbech.
Colin Tyrell said the council's actions were "most unusual" but decided it would be contrary to natural justice to prevent them from making its case.
In the event, however, Mr Tyrell allowed the appeal against Fenland Council's refusal to allow the homes to be built north of 1 Sandringham Avenue.
M L Engineering, who owns the site, claimed that an allegation by a local councillor that the area had no semi detached homes was simply not true and that 28 of the 36 homes in Sandringham Avenue were semi detached.
You may also want to watch:
Mr Tyrell said he gave "little weight" to this issue, relying instead on deciding whether the homes would be an overdevelopment of the site and compatible with the area.
He concluded the new homes would have "very little impact" on the surroundings, and were of a suitable design.
- 1 Body found in Wisbech road
- 2 ‘High risk’ paedophile had indecent images of children on his phone
- 3 Top Cabinet post for NE Cambs MP Steve Barclay
- 4 Family remembers 'cheeky, friendly and well-liked' mechanic
- 5 Mayor opens Wisbech community hub
- 6 Man confronted in live stream cleared of all sex abuse allegations
- 7 Did you bite your husband's leg? ‘No, he knocked all my teeth out- I could not bite his leg’
- 8 Co-op grocery delivery robots are coming to Cambridgeshire
- 9 Lack of public transport blamed for collapse of £10.5m training centre
- 10 Off-duty detective snares £200k drug dealer
In a separate battle over costs, M L Engineering said there was a "serious failure" of the council not to produce evidence in time.
"The evidence presented today by the council's representative is unsubstantiated and unreasonable," the company told the hearing.
However the council argued that its' members had strong planning grounds for refusal, even though their views differed from those of the officers.
Mr Tyrell refused an application for costs, saying the decision by the committee involved "subjective matters" and an award for costs was not justified.
However he said the council was guilty of "unreasonable behaviour" and a "serious failure" in not supplying pre inquiry evidence, but said M L Engineering had not incurred additional costs for a hearing which had only lasted 70 minutes.