Inspector bans domestic wind turbine and warns of “renewable energy apparatus featuring across an arc of almost 180 degrees”

11:35 19 August 2014

Laddus Drove, Friday Bridge, proposed turbine

Laddus Drove, Friday Bridge, proposed turbine

Archant

A Government inspector says his decision to ban a domestic wind turbine in the Fens will protect the view of those who already look out at 24 industrial turbines at Coldham and Stag’s Holt.

Ron Boyd ruled that the proposed 19kw small scale wind turbine in Laddus Drove, Friday Bridge, would “result in the presence of renewable energy apparatus featuring across an arc of almost 180 degrees.

“This would be especially harmful to views from the rear of Forties Farm Cottage and Butterfly Barn.”

Mr Boyd backed the view of Fenland planners that the turbine application by James Lawrence for Laddus House would create a “cumulative impact” detrimental to some living in the area.

Those living at Forties Farm and Butterfly Barn, for example, he said have a view dominated by the wind farm turbines at Coldham. Their only turbine free view would be gone if the domestic turbine was allowed.

“The cumulative impact would thus be that of an encircling presence of turbines across the entire outlook from the rear of these homes,” said Mr Boyd. “I conclude that this would have an unacceptable impact, adversely affecting the living conditions of the occupants.”

Much as the Government favoured renewable energy, even small scale projects such as this, Mr Boyd said it would not outweigh the harm he had identified and the conflict with the development plan for the area.

He added: “It would be significantly larger than a typical telegraph pole and would be prominent within local views in this flat landscape.”

* Is your life blighted by wind turbines? Has Fenland done its bit for renewable energy? email john.elworthy@archant.co.uk

2 comments

  • I fail to understand this ruling. If the area already has lots of wind turbines, the addition of a much smaller domestic one won't impact on the area. Plus, when people buy a home, they do not own the view. Why are the powers that be so backward looking when someone tries to do something for themselves and for the environment? It seems that planning permission is granted if you are a large company wanting to make profits, but if you are an individual wanting to save yourself some money AND do right by the environment, you won't be granted it. As per usual, it's profit before people in this country.

    Report this comment

    fenwoman

    Friday, August 22, 2014

  • "* Is your life blighted by wind turbines? Has Fenland done its bit for renewable energy? email john.elworthy@archant.co.uk" Is this a newspaper or campaign organisation? This certainly does not read as balanced reporting. Does this site reveal any funding it receives to publish one-sided "news" articles like this?

    Report this comment

    Richard

    Tuesday, August 19, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

More news stories

Yesterday, 15:43
Maxey auction team

The new National Living Wage has dealt a hammer blow to a Wisbech auction house which is blaming the compulsory pay rise for a decision to close this autumn.

Yesterday, 14:12
MP Steve Barclay with a letter from Eric Pickles last year that offered encouragement for the rail lik

Re-opening of the Wisbech to March rail line could cost from £70million to £110million says a new report out today which strengthens the case for the project.

Yesterday, 16:06
Sainsbury's

Sainsbury’s bid to open a store in Whittlesey looked increasingly fragile tonight after their late efforts to overturn “onerous” planning conditions were rejected by Fenland District Council.

Yesterday, 11:56
Rural crime still an issue in Cambridgeshire

Fuel, tractors, machinery and trailers top the thieves ‘wish list’ in Cambridgeshire despite rural crime dropping last year.

Most read stories

Most commented stories

Digital Edition

Image
Read the Wisbech Standard e-edition today E-edition